Namespaces Page Discussion. Views View Edit History. From cppreference. Keywords Escape sequences. Namespace declaration. Namespace aliases. Fundamental types Enumeration types Function types. Compound types Union types. Default initialization Value initialization Zero initialization Copy initialization Direct initialization. Expressions Value categories Order of evaluation.
Operators Operator precedence. Class declaration Constructors this pointer. Access specifiers friend specifier.
Class template Function template. Inline assembly. Category : Todo with reason. Compiler support. Freestanding and hosted. Language support library. Technical specifications. Flow control. Function declaration. Lambda function expression. Fundamental types. The code has generic implementation of queue class Queue with simple operations such as push and pop. The foo does int specialization, and bar does string. The declaration and definition are all in one header file, template.
Each of the foo. We could breakup the header into two parts: declaration interface and definition implementation so that we can keep the consistency regarding the separation of interface from implementation. We usually name the interface file as. However, the end result is the same: we should include those in the. There is a delicate but significant distinction between class template and template class :.
Toggle navigation BogoToBogo. In the inclusion model, you include the member definitions in every file that uses a template. This approach is simplest and provides maximum flexibility in terms of what concrete types can be used with your template. Its disadvantage is that it can increase compilation times. With the explicit instantiation approach, the template itself instantiates concrete classes or class members for specific types.
This approach can speed up compilation times, but it limits usage to only those classes that the template implementer has enabled ahead of time.
In general, we recommend that you use the inclusion model unless the compilation times become a problem. Templates are not like ordinary classes in the sense that the compiler does not generate object code for a template or any of its members.
There is nothing to generate until the template is instantiated with concrete types. It also attempts to generate code for any member functions that are used. If those definitions are in a file that is not included, directly or indirectly, in the. From the compiler's point of view, this isn't necessarily an error because the functions may be defined in another translation unit, in which case the linker will find them. If the linker does not find that code, it raises an unresolved external error.
The simplest and most common way to make template definitions visible throughout a translation unit, is to put the definitions in the header file itself. This is the approach used in the Standard Library.
0コメント